skip to main content
Corticon Studio: Rule Modeling Guide : Logical analysis and optimization : Validating and testing Rulesheets in Corticon Studio : The completeness checker : Renumbering Rules

Try Corticon Now
Renumbering Rules
Continuing with the previous pregnancy example, let's assume that we agree that sub-rules 3.1 and 3.3 are impossible, and so may be safely ignored. However, we decide to keep sub-rules 3.2 and 3.4 and assign Actions to them. For this example, we will just post violation messages to them.
However, when we try to enter Rule Statements for sub-rules 3.2 and 3.4, we discover that Rule Statements can only be entered for general rules (whole-numbered columns), not sub-rules. To convert column 3, with its four sub-rules, into four whole-numbered general rules, select Rulesheet >Rule Column(s)>Renumber Rules from the Studio menubar.
Figure 232. Sub-Rules Renumbered and Converted to General Rules
Now that the columns have been renumbered, Rule Statements may be assigned to columns 4 and 6, and columns 3 and 5 can be deleted or disabled (if you want to do so).
When impossible or useless rules are created by the Completeness Checker, we recommend disabling the rule columns rather than deleting them. When disabled, the columns remain visible to all modelers, eliminating any surprise (and shock) when future modelers apply the Completeness Check and discover missing rules that you had already found and deleted. And if you disable the columns, be sure to include a Rule Statement that explains why. See the following figure for an example of a fully complete and well-documented Rulesheet
Figure 233. Final Rulesheet with impossible rules disabled