Most legacy computing environments have used ASCII character encoding developed by the ANSI standards body to store and manipulate character strings inside software applications. ASCII encoding was convenient for programmers because each ASCII character could be stored as a byte. The initial version of ASCII used only 7 of the 8 bits available in a byte, which meant that applications could use only 128 different characters. This version of ASCII could not account for European characters and was completely inadequate for Asian characters. Using the eighth bit to extend the total range of characters to 256 added support for most European characters. Today, ASCII refers to either the 7-bit or 8-bit encoding of characters.
As the need increased for applications with additional international support, ANSI again increased the functionality of ASCII by developing an extension to accommodate multilingual software. The extension, known as the Double-Byte Character Set (DBCS), allowed existing applications to function without change, but provided for the use of additional characters, including complex Asian characters. With DBCS, characters map to either one byte (for example, American ASCII characters) or two bytes (for example, Asian characters). The DBCS environment also introduced the concept of an operating system code page that identified how characters would be encoded into byte sequences in a particular computing environment. DBCS encoding provided a cross-platform mechanism for building multilingual applications.
Using a DBCS, however, was not ideal; many developers felt that there was a better way to solve the problem. A group of leading software companies joined forces to form the Unicode Consortium. Together, they produced a new solution to building worldwide applications —Unicode. Unicode was originally designed as a fixed-width, uniform two-byte designation that could represent all modern scripts without the use of code pages. The Unicode Consortium has continued to evaluate new characters, and the current number of supported characters is over 112,000.
Although it seemed to be the perfect solution to building multilingual applications, Unicode started off with a significant drawback—it would have to be retrofitted into existing computing environments. To use the new paradigm, all applications would have to change. As a result, several standards-based transliterations were designed to convert two-byte fixed Unicode values into more appropriate character encodings, including, among others, UTF-8, UCS-2, and UTF-16.
UTF-8 is a standard method for transforming Unicode values into byte sequences that maintain transparency for all ASCII codes. UTF-8 is recognized by the Unicode Consortium as a mechanism for transforming Unicode values and is popular for use with HTML, XML, and other protocols. UTF-8 is, however, currently used primarily on AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, and Linux.
UCS-2 encoding is a fixed, two-byte encoding sequence and is a method for transforming Unicode values into byte sequences. It is the standard for Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Me, and Windows NT.
UTF-16 is a superset of UCS-2, with the addition of some special characters in surrogate pairs. UTF-16 is the standard encoding for Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and higher, Windows Vista, Windows 7, and higher. Microsoft recommends using UTF-16 for new applications.
Hybrid Data Pipeline Driver forODBC is fully Unicode enabled. On UNIX and Linux platforms, the driver supports both UTF-8 and UTF-16. On Windows platforms, the driver supports UCS-2/UTF-16 only.